When CAIR sued investigators they weren’t smart enough to realize that the defendants would be able to offer evidence of their radical ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas. The question if this evidence is allowed will be will the deniers of their civilization jihad goals change their opinions of CAIR? First the judge has to allow the evidence.

CAIR ‘terrified’ jury will learn of its radical ties

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/05/cair-terrified-jury-will-learn-of-its-radical-ties/

Refresher course on goals of Muslim Brotherhood from May ’91. This was used as evidence in Holy Land Foundation Trial.

Brigitte Gabriel just revealed the Muslim plan for the destruction of America – Israel Video Network

http://www.israelvideonetwork.com/brigitte-gabriel-just-revealed-the-muslim-plan-for-the-destruction-of-america/?utm_source=Lando&utm_campaign=Mar-5-2017&utm_medium=cpm&utm_content=Brigitte%20Destruction

Don’t think “honor” killings only happen in third world countries dominated by these animals. It has happened in Texas and elsewhere in America. Religion of peace my ass!! They have no respect for life of their own people much less anyone else’s.

Women Are Dying in Overseas Honor Killings, and No One Knows How Bad the Problem Is

http://www.newsweek.com/2017/05/12/honor-killings-violence-against-women-seeta-kaur-india-pakistan-593691.html

Bluntly speaking, no one can be a Muslim and an American at the same time.

This is from Amil Imani

Here are some of the reasons.
            * A Muslim is, first and foremost, an Ummaist—a citizen of international Islam. So, when a Muslim takes the Pledge of Allegiance, he is either ignorant of the implication of his pledge or is lying willfully. Ignorance is never a valid reason in the court of law, and lying in the process of becoming a citizen is grounds for denying the application and even deporting the violator. Sadly enough, taqiyya —lying, or dissimulation—is not only condoned, it is recommended to Muslims in their scripture. Hence, a Muslim can and would lie without any compunction, whenever it is expedient.
            * Muslims, by belief and practice, are the most blatant violators of human rights. We hardly need to detail here Muslims’ systemic cruel treatment of the unbelievers, women of all persuasions, and any and all minorities across the board. To Muslims, human rights have a different meaning, and its protective provisions are reserved strictly for Muslims—primarily for Muslim men. Just a couple of examples should suffice for now. 
Oppression of women, for one, is so systemic in Islam that to this day women are, at best, second-class citizens under Islamic law. Saudi Arabia, the custodian of Islamdom, denies women the right to drive, vote or hold elective office—the most basic rights of citizens in democratic societies.
For another, no non-Islamic literature is allowed in Saudi Arabia. A visiting Christian, for instance, is denied entry to the Kingdom with a Bible. Further, severe punishment is meted out to anyone daring to disagree with Islam or espouse a different religion. Iran’s resurgent Shiism often vies with Saudi Arabia in its mistreatment of religious and non-religious minorities. To the fanatical ruling gang in Iran, it is their brand of Islam or disenfranchisement of rights of citizenship and even death for the “sin” of apostasy. And of course, there is no point at all in talking about the savage Islamic Taliban and ISIS. 
            * Respect for the rule of law, as it is understood and practiced by civilized people, is an instrument of convenience to be used to advantage and to be violated when it is not, for the Muslim. A Muslim believes in a different law—the Sharia: a set of Stone Age rules. Violation of the non-Muslim laws, therefore, is no violation at all to a Muslim. 
            What is incredible is the gall and audacity of Muslims in demanding that Western and other democracies legalize Sharia in their societies. Large populations of Muslims, mostly recent arrivals, in countries such as Canada, Great Britain, and Sweden are experiencing the insistent demands of Muslims to have Sharia rule their Islamic communities. This is just the beginning and it may seem relatively harmless to the simpletons in our midst. Yet, once Sharia is recognized to any extent, it will reach out to rule not only on matters that concern Muslims but also those that may involve a Muslim and non-Muslim. Under Sharia, a Muslim man married to a non-Muslim woman is able to divorce the woman at will, automatically have custody of the children, and literally, toss the wife out of “his” home with just about no compensations.
            * As for democracy, the rule of the people, Muslims have no use at all. Muslims believe that Allah’s rule must govern the world in the form a Caliphate—a theocracy. Making a mockery of democracy, subverting its workings, and ignoring its provisions is a Muslim’s way of falsifying what he already believes to be a sinful and false system of governance invented by the infidels.
To Muslims, Umma-ism—international Islamism—is the legitimate form of government. Umma-ism is another form of despotism such as Communism and Fascism, with the added feature of enjoying “divine” authority.
The world has good examples of Umma-ism in practice to scrutinize in Islamic autocracies. Khamenei of Iran is not called “Caliph.” He is called the “Supreme Guide.” The Saudi King is just another Caliph vessel of the “divine.” These Islamic despots are every bit as vile as the Hitlers, the Stalins, the Pol Pots, and the Mussolinis. The government of these Islamic autocrats head is infested to the core with the Islamic disease of oppression, corruption and the absence of accountability to the people.
Democracies believe that government must be of the people, by the people, and for the people. Umma-ism is anathema to this sacrosanct fundamental democratic ideal. 
As more and more Muslims arrive in non-Islamic lands, as they reproduce with great fecundity, as they convert the disenchanted and minorities, and as petrodollar-flush Muslims and Muslim treasuries supply generous funds, Muslims gather more power to undermine democratic rule. A consortium composed of pandering politicians, blinded with short-term self-interest and egoism; attention and fund-seeking self-proclaimed prima donna professors; and, bastions of useful idiot liberals, universities, is the witting or unwitting promoter of Umma-ism.
It is human nature to be concerned, first and foremost, with their own personal well-being. Some people evolve to a higher level of humanness and place the welfare of the general public above their own. Yet, many remain fixated at the constricted stage of “self first, self, last.” Even if you belong to this latter group, your self-interest demands that you do all you can to make sure that the disease of Islamofascism does not devour democracy or our Republic. Democracy is both fragile and corruptible. It takes vigilant citizenry to protect its integrity.